srizals@gmail.com
Citizens are what made up a country or a nation. A nation cannot exist without citizens, it surely cannot exist solely on just a citizen, since a country also needs leaders to be appointed from its citizens, to lead the citizens and to ensure relative peace and prosperity for their fellow citizens, the very people that had appointed the selected groups of citizens to be a different group, a sub group of the citizens, to be the ruling elites, directly or indirectly. The ruling elites owe that much from the other average citizens that had granted them power over them in the first place. They have been granted the power to lead and decide by the very people that they lead. The citizens would follow and obey, whole-heartedly or half-heartedly.
Because the resources of a country is not that abundant actually or never is enough to feed some of the ruling elites and the rich in certain nations, they must be well managed to show to the citizens that their wealth is and was properly managed and distributed equally for the sake of the nation and the citizens themselves. An order of livelihood was thus declared; those who strived would get their fair share of that wealth, since dwindling sources would never be enough to be spend lavishly without measure for everyone on everything. So the rule is the more you give and contribute and sacrifice would mean the more the share of the wealth of the nation would be in your hands. In this way, the citizens would be motivated to improve themselves, competing among themselves in a healthy and positive manner that would in turn build a greater nation, a richer nation for everyone that live in that particular country.
It sounds too good to be true. The reality is the wealth of the nation is never equally distributed among the citizens. The wealth of the nation, no matter how abundant it is, will always be in the hands of the lucky selected few. It is mostly revolved and recycled itself among its manipulators; the few people that broke the cycle of citizenry to become ruthless and fat controllers of a monopoly system. The others can only watch from the outside. And so all the indicators of wealth and achievement of a country that would cause many mouths to open in amazement and eyes to stare enviously was not actually a blanket blessing to everyone in a wealthy nation. Maybe the twenty percent of the lucky citizens actually are living what the indicators of wealth of a nation shows or even more, but around sixty percent of the not so lucky, and twenty percent more unfortunate, would never see or live any of those said wealth their beloved country had gained or gain.
Their standard of living and livelihood would be very much the same. They would of course see more and more progress around them, more beautiful buildings with unnecessary fancy decorations to make the rich richer unnecessarily. I still remember a weird looking building that looked like a gate of a great fortress city of the medieval age. It would eat up hundreds of millions of hard earned money more to be completed ‘safely’. Millions more would be lost in repairing fancy road system made by the not so intelligent and honest that were 'blessed' with friendly contracts to ensure more rich people were created out of the blue, among the ordinary citizens to be shown as proof or indicators that the nation is really actually progressing and getting richer by the minute. We are having 50 more rich people among us, among the 100,000 average Joes that would be lucky enough to witness all their fancy wealth with envious mind.
In a system of capitalism, an absolute profit-oriented system, the benefit of the social interest or the citizens would come last. They are fed with chicken feed to make sure they would not die out or revolt against the ruling elites and the lavish elites of the society. This system is absolutely foreign and unsuited for most country that truly believe their citizens, every one of them, is also a part of an exclusive membership of the 'rich' country that has real wealth and assets unlike printed paper money or mere numbers on the screens of computers.
Please take care of your citizens, the poor, the in-between and the rich. Make sure everyone gets his fair share of the growing cake of economy. Don't be like Gaddafi, Ben Ali and Mubarak. Especially Gaddafi. For him, his citizens are expendable. Like most rulers of nations do.
Friday, March 18, 2011
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Laughing at Other's Peril
srizals@gmail.com
I've never been embarrassed of myself when reading mainstream newspaper before. How unlucky I was. When everyone was anxiously reading about the recent tsunami and earthquake that hit Japan recently, some made the event as a turning point of their career to become an inconsiderate joker without a brain and any sensitivity nerves. I don't know what has been troubling in the back of the minds of these clowns. Could it be that they still can't forgive the Japanese for invading Malaysia, tens of years ago? Is it because of envy since Japanese cars dominated most of the tarmac in Malaysia? It beats me. I can't find any logical explanation instead of potent stupidity of some that tries to show just how smart they can get. I wonder what they would have felt if they knew about some sick humors of the likes of them when tsunami struck Indonesia.
For your information, the Japanese have repeatedly apologised for its war crimes to all and everyone. Some still pending of course, like the perils of the "comfort" women for the Japanese Imperial Armies, but it has been providing funds and help to almost all that had suffered its might, Malaysia not excluded. I don't recall any apology from Britain, Portugal and Holland for their past atrocities and crimes towards any of their victims. That is how honourable the Japanese are. My heart goes with them and all that were involved in such misfortune. My friends are there. Hope they are safe. Always.
A good man would always suffer with the suffering of his fellow humans. A lesser man would rejoice.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Friday, March 11, 2011
Kita Hamba: Raihan
Raihan
We are merely human beings, given this gift of life not for eternity,
We are merely human beings, in reality, servants of Allah.
But why we keep on postponing when the time has come to pray to Him?
But why we keep on forgetting, the duties that we have as servants of Allah?
We are merely human beings, given this gift of life, not for eternity,
We are merely human beings, in reality, servants of Allah.
But why we keep on forgetting, the duties that we have, as servants of Allah?
And as for God, never He forgets to bless us with the beauties of this life,
Always willing to forgive all our sins, we did there before Him.
For those who realise and repent, and cleanse themselves of sins.
We are merely human beings granted this gift of life, not for eternity,
We are merely human beings, in reality, servants of Allah.
But why we keep on postponing, when the time has come to pray to Him?
But why we keep on forgetting, the duties that we have as servants of Allah?
And as for God, never He forgets to bless us with the beauties of this life,
Always willing to forgive all ours sins, we did before Him.
For those who realise and repent, and cleanse themselves of sins. 2x
Wake up in the silence of the night, to whisper personally to Him,
Ask for His love ,
And be safe, in this world and the next.
For those who realise and repent, and cleanse themselves of sins. (fading)
We are merely human beings, in reality, servants of Allah.
But why we keep on postponing when the time has come to pray to Him?
But why we keep on forgetting, the duties that we have as servants of Allah?
We are merely human beings, given this gift of life, not for eternity,
We are merely human beings, in reality, servants of Allah.
But why we keep on forgetting, the duties that we have, as servants of Allah?
And as for God, never He forgets to bless us with the beauties of this life,
Always willing to forgive all our sins, we did there before Him.
For those who realise and repent, and cleanse themselves of sins.
We are merely human beings granted this gift of life, not for eternity,
We are merely human beings, in reality, servants of Allah.
But why we keep on postponing, when the time has come to pray to Him?
But why we keep on forgetting, the duties that we have as servants of Allah?
And as for God, never He forgets to bless us with the beauties of this life,
Always willing to forgive all ours sins, we did before Him.
For those who realise and repent, and cleanse themselves of sins. 2x
Wake up in the silence of the night, to whisper personally to Him,
Ask for His love ,
And be safe, in this world and the next.
For those who realise and repent, and cleanse themselves of sins. (fading)
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Why?
srizals@gmail.com
Why, you asked me?
How long has it been?
The oceans are dying
The leatherbacks are disappearing
We pollute with plastics
Choking the earth with smoke
By our greed,
Our never ending greed
There’s still hope for tomorrow
A hope for tomorrow
Let’s move forward
A little step at a time
Let’s remedy the earth
For the sake of our children
For us, your own little children
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Mughal and Massacres of the Hindu
srizals said...True, Len, there are sects distinctively different from the mainstream. Could you list the percentages of Christians according to their sects and numbers? The mainstream Muslims are Ahlus Sunnah wal jamaah, the minority groups are Syiah (which has 3 more distinctive groups), Ahmadiyyah. Only one nation of Islam is Syiah. As for Ahmadiyyah, they are considered astray as they have other final prophet after the actual final prophet. And other smaller sects are not even Muslims anymore, like the Sikhs and Baha’is. Who are the mainstream Christians?
Voyager, take a voyage in history or go back to the time of the dinosaurs. It would help improve your history skills, I hope.
Yes, the Arabs, Turks, Afghans and the Moghul invaded the mighty Hindu Rajputs and so almost did Alexander the Great. Muslim Moghul that unlike the pagan Mongol, were keen to build instead of obliterate, prospering the lands of the suicidal Hindus that had forgotten about their Kalki Avatar, but instead fell in love with Suttee and dehumanizing Caste system while blaming others for mentioning about it.
Could you please share your resources of the millions that perished in the Muslim conquest? Reliable one hopefully, since not enough true historians dared to suggest so. Hope you're not a deliberate liar. A confused liar I hope. My proof, the Hindus are aplenty nowadays as they once were, far outnumbering the decimated Christians and Jews. Could they have recovered in such a speedy way from an unchecked holocaust? Get real.
May I present a proof why I don't think that Muhammad s.a.w. was just a man.
Thawban – may Allah be pleased with him – that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) said, “Two groups of my umma Allah has protected from the hellfire: a group that will conquer India and a group that will be with ‘Isa b. Maryam – ‘alaihimas- salat was-salam.” Reported Ahmad, an-Nisa’i, and at-Tabarani
Voyager, take a voyage in history or go back to the time of the dinosaurs. It would help improve your history skills, I hope.
Yes, the Arabs, Turks, Afghans and the Moghul invaded the mighty Hindu Rajputs and so almost did Alexander the Great. Muslim Moghul that unlike the pagan Mongol, were keen to build instead of obliterate, prospering the lands of the suicidal Hindus that had forgotten about their Kalki Avatar, but instead fell in love with Suttee and dehumanizing Caste system while blaming others for mentioning about it.
Could you please share your resources of the millions that perished in the Muslim conquest? Reliable one hopefully, since not enough true historians dared to suggest so. Hope you're not a deliberate liar. A confused liar I hope. My proof, the Hindus are aplenty nowadays as they once were, far outnumbering the decimated Christians and Jews. Could they have recovered in such a speedy way from an unchecked holocaust? Get real.
May I present a proof why I don't think that Muhammad s.a.w. was just a man.
Thawban – may Allah be pleased with him – that the Messenger of Allah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) said, “Two groups of my umma Allah has protected from the hellfire: a group that will conquer India and a group that will be with ‘Isa b. Maryam – ‘alaihimas- salat was-salam.” Reported Ahmad, an-Nisa’i, and at-Tabarani
srizals said...The prophecy on India was fulfilled while another one is pending, hopefully I would still be alive then, with all the nuclear bombs lying around in the hands of those who are scared of being killed, but not scared of killing, of course.
India prospered until the British Raj came and massacred more Hindus and Muslims and used them as slave soldiers throughout its empire. Hindu nobles even allied themselves with Muslim rulers. Could you honestly believe they would do so with their exterminators, in the age of the clashing swords?
"Communally focused critics of Mughal rule have often ignored how particular caste categories offered their services and allegiance to Mughal rules, and received tangible benefits in exchange. Kayasthas in particular experienced upward mobility as they rose from being scribes and junior record-keepers to hold important administrative posts, and achieved a social rank comparable to court Brahmins. Mercantile caste categories also had a stake in the success of Mughal rule. Hindu money-lenders and shop-keepers did quite well in the prosperous Mughal towns, and a majority of the top revenue administrators under the Mughals (even during the reign of Aurangzeb) were either Hindu Banias or Brahmins."
http://india_resource.tripod.com/mughal.html
India prospered until the British Raj came and massacred more Hindus and Muslims and used them as slave soldiers throughout its empire. Hindu nobles even allied themselves with Muslim rulers. Could you honestly believe they would do so with their exterminators, in the age of the clashing swords?
"Communally focused critics of Mughal rule have often ignored how particular caste categories offered their services and allegiance to Mughal rules, and received tangible benefits in exchange. Kayasthas in particular experienced upward mobility as they rose from being scribes and junior record-keepers to hold important administrative posts, and achieved a social rank comparable to court Brahmins. Mercantile caste categories also had a stake in the success of Mughal rule. Hindu money-lenders and shop-keepers did quite well in the prosperous Mughal towns, and a majority of the top revenue administrators under the Mughals (even during the reign of Aurangzeb) were either Hindu Banias or Brahmins."
http://india_resource.tripod.com/mughal.html
srizals said...If you're afraid of any Muslim becoming hostile towards you, outshame him out of himself by this saying from his prophet. Since the frequency of the attacks and the daily death tolls are nothing similar as suffered by the Afghanis, Iraqis and Pakistanis in the hands of the likes of you, I'm guessing the probability is quite low. Hope you do have a peace treaty with the Muslims, though. And if it is not too much to ask, could you please get out from their lands asap. And do take along your fancy weaponry that you used to kill their children.
And he said, "He who kills a non-Muslim who keeps a peace treaty with the Muslims will not smell the scent of Heaven, though its scent can be traced to as far as a march of 40 years"
[Imam Ahmad and Al-Bukhari in Al-Jizyah]
I don't recall anyone dared to abrogate this hadith, Johnny. Maybe some self-appointed scholars of Islam dared to abrogate them for you. Do you have the authority or even the knowledge to do so?
Len, Jesus speaks Aramaic, not Hebrew.
"One of the most striking Aramaic sentences found on the lips of Jesus in the Gospels is: eli eli lema sabachthani (Matthew 27:46; Mark 15:34 uses eloi instead of eli). The sentence is then translated into Greek by Matthew and Mark, with the English meaning: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" This, as it turns out, is a quotation from Psalm 22:1, which reads in Hebrew: 'eli 'eli lama 'azavtani. (Here you can see, by the way, an example of the similarity between Aramaic and Hebrew.) The fact that Matthew and Mark have Jesus speaking in Aramaic does suggest that this line was remembered by the early Christian community in its original language, namely, Aramaic."
Read more: http://blog.beliefnet.com/markdroberts/pages/series/what-language-did-jesus-speak-why-does-it-matter.html#ixzz1Fe4ATjlQ
And he said, "He who kills a non-Muslim who keeps a peace treaty with the Muslims will not smell the scent of Heaven, though its scent can be traced to as far as a march of 40 years"
[Imam Ahmad and Al-Bukhari in Al-Jizyah]
I don't recall anyone dared to abrogate this hadith, Johnny. Maybe some self-appointed scholars of Islam dared to abrogate them for you. Do you have the authority or even the knowledge to do so?
Len, Jesus speaks Aramaic, not Hebrew.
"One of the most striking Aramaic sentences found on the lips of Jesus in the Gospels is: eli eli lema sabachthani (Matthew 27:46; Mark 15:34 uses eloi instead of eli). The sentence is then translated into Greek by Matthew and Mark, with the English meaning: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" This, as it turns out, is a quotation from Psalm 22:1, which reads in Hebrew: 'eli 'eli lama 'azavtani. (Here you can see, by the way, an example of the similarity between Aramaic and Hebrew.) The fact that Matthew and Mark have Jesus speaking in Aramaic does suggest that this line was remembered by the early Christian community in its original language, namely, Aramaic."
Read more: http://blog.beliefnet.com/markdroberts/pages/series/what-language-did-jesus-speak-why-does-it-matter.html#ixzz1Fe4ATjlQ
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Paedophilia's Concept In The East and The West
Ernst Stavro Blofeld said...An Amusingly Moustached Foreign Chappie whined 25 February 2011 16:28
Happy Now!
Happy Now!
srizals said...Ah, much better, Ernst, but I don't like the way you petting your cat; it looks like the hands of Doctor Evil in some Inspector Gadget's scene or something. You're not him, are you?
Oswin, a man can say whatever he wants to. Backing them up with solid evidences and examples to support his arguments is something else. For you, I'll provide this link about the one that died on the cross. The heritage goes longer back in history than D Singh could have ever imagined. Len might not like the paganism element involved. Non Mouse would constantly be in the state of denial, as most are.
Zeitgeist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNf-P_5u_Hw
I have not encountered any counter measure by any Christians even until now, except denial without refuting them with evidences and examples. Hope you can. As for the abundant lies against Islam, I have almost all the answers refuting them in the web links in my blog, if I can't find them or think they are not enough, I'll use my own neurons to assist me. The answers were not refuted by anyone, convincingly, as the allegations themselves in the first place.
For example, the only culture and religion that specifically had torture as their norm is Christianity and White Caucasians. It was instrumental only to them; Narni was one great, recent example. Gaza, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo are their continuum.
Second, the only religion and culture that killed civilians/dissidents horribly was/is based on Christianity and White Caucasians. The only creature that used weapon of mass destruction on civilians instead of heavily armed armies was not man as many scientists would suggest. I reject being generalised with them. We should narrow down the category for better understanding.
The major culprits in exploiting sex to corrupt the human race while profiting on them without shame, are none other, well, you guessed it right, Ernst.
All these events were not isolated instances nor did they happen in a short lapse of time, definitely not limited occurrences. They were wide spread, consistent and had a long life span.
The only religious institution tarred by sexual scandals worldwide is based on Christianity and White Caucasians as do major paedophiles, worldwide too, in the past and even now.
It is better to focus on your own religion and culture than trying to defile others. You may not like the end result.
The only new sect of religion born out of a king's desire to divorce his queen and marry another was also based on Christianity and a specific identifiable race.
True, some would say these examples were committed by criminals. The only problem is that they were not considered by criminals by the majority of their culture and religion. Most remained in powerful and luxurious position, Scot free even he's English. Some would not dare to go to certain countries in fear of indictment, of course.
Oswin, please provide the examples and evidences that you have as proof against Islam. If I can, I'll address them here or in my blog. Elegant silence is no longer the rule of the day. It would only be showing the obvious.
Last but not least, the region of Caucasus that was said as the origin of Whites had not been Christians for a long time now. They even survived Stalin and the Gulag. As all the same people that believed as they had believed. It made them indestructible. No matter what the tyrants and their democratic compatriots did and do to them. The Aryans and the ten lost tribes of Israel are not Christians too. They are now battling the Western occupying forces, defending their beloved motherland of Afghanistan and Pakistan, outgunned as always. Undefeated as always. They are the master race remember?
http://www.white-history.com/hwr5c.htm
http://ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/329/Q1/
Oswin, a man can say whatever he wants to. Backing them up with solid evidences and examples to support his arguments is something else. For you, I'll provide this link about the one that died on the cross. The heritage goes longer back in history than D Singh could have ever imagined. Len might not like the paganism element involved. Non Mouse would constantly be in the state of denial, as most are.
Zeitgeist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNf-P_5u_Hw
I have not encountered any counter measure by any Christians even until now, except denial without refuting them with evidences and examples. Hope you can. As for the abundant lies against Islam, I have almost all the answers refuting them in the web links in my blog, if I can't find them or think they are not enough, I'll use my own neurons to assist me. The answers were not refuted by anyone, convincingly, as the allegations themselves in the first place.
For example, the only culture and religion that specifically had torture as their norm is Christianity and White Caucasians. It was instrumental only to them; Narni was one great, recent example. Gaza, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo are their continuum.
Second, the only religion and culture that killed civilians/dissidents horribly was/is based on Christianity and White Caucasians. The only creature that used weapon of mass destruction on civilians instead of heavily armed armies was not man as many scientists would suggest. I reject being generalised with them. We should narrow down the category for better understanding.
The major culprits in exploiting sex to corrupt the human race while profiting on them without shame, are none other, well, you guessed it right, Ernst.
All these events were not isolated instances nor did they happen in a short lapse of time, definitely not limited occurrences. They were wide spread, consistent and had a long life span.
The only religious institution tarred by sexual scandals worldwide is based on Christianity and White Caucasians as do major paedophiles, worldwide too, in the past and even now.
It is better to focus on your own religion and culture than trying to defile others. You may not like the end result.
The only new sect of religion born out of a king's desire to divorce his queen and marry another was also based on Christianity and a specific identifiable race.
True, some would say these examples were committed by criminals. The only problem is that they were not considered by criminals by the majority of their culture and religion. Most remained in powerful and luxurious position, Scot free even he's English. Some would not dare to go to certain countries in fear of indictment, of course.
Oswin, please provide the examples and evidences that you have as proof against Islam. If I can, I'll address them here or in my blog. Elegant silence is no longer the rule of the day. It would only be showing the obvious.
Last but not least, the region of Caucasus that was said as the origin of Whites had not been Christians for a long time now. They even survived Stalin and the Gulag. As all the same people that believed as they had believed. It made them indestructible. No matter what the tyrants and their democratic compatriots did and do to them. The Aryans and the ten lost tribes of Israel are not Christians too. They are now battling the Western occupying forces, defending their beloved motherland of Afghanistan and Pakistan, outgunned as always. Undefeated as always. They are the master race remember?
http://www.white-history.com/hwr5c.htm
http://ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/329/Q1/
Anonymous said...srizals: Total gibberish. To take one example of what you say, which religious sect was born out of a king's desire? I hope you don't mean Protestantism as this pre-dates Henry. The Church of England is a Protestant church.
Have you actually read the Koran? I doubt it if you have or you wouldn't claim Islam to be a non-violent creed. Beating women, cutting off hands, killing non-Muslims as a quick route to paradise, telling lies to unbelievers, having no unbeliever friends, hatred of Jews, not supporting unbelievers against a Muslim no matter if he is wrong etc etc. Mohammed went with a young girl and most Caucasians would call him a paedophile. It is easy to claim Muslims are not paedophiles when Islam makes it acceptabel. I note that we have quite a lot of Pakistani paedophiles in this country or don't they count?
You are delusional.
Have you actually read the Koran? I doubt it if you have or you wouldn't claim Islam to be a non-violent creed. Beating women, cutting off hands, killing non-Muslims as a quick route to paradise, telling lies to unbelievers, having no unbeliever friends, hatred of Jews, not supporting unbelievers against a Muslim no matter if he is wrong etc etc. Mohammed went with a young girl and most Caucasians would call him a paedophile. It is easy to claim Muslims are not paedophiles when Islam makes it acceptabel. I note that we have quite a lot of Pakistani paedophiles in this country or don't they count?
You are delusional.
Oswin said...Srizals @ 02:29 :
Haven't we done this before old chap? I seem to recall you saying so yourself, yes?
It cannot have escaped your notice that your revered prophet does not stand too close a scrutiny? I think I've said before: bandit, con-man, war-leader, murderer, extortionist, womaniser and, possibly worse still, yes?
Each and all accusations have been put to you before, with all relevent references supplied, which you have never addressed, but sought to bamboozle with your inimitable, and wide-ranging smoke-screen of bluster, blether and piffle.
I hope, old bean, that you and your family are well?
Haven't we done this before old chap? I seem to recall you saying so yourself, yes?
It cannot have escaped your notice that your revered prophet does not stand too close a scrutiny? I think I've said before: bandit, con-man, war-leader, murderer, extortionist, womaniser and, possibly worse still, yes?
Each and all accusations have been put to you before, with all relevent references supplied, which you have never addressed, but sought to bamboozle with your inimitable, and wide-ranging smoke-screen of bluster, blether and piffle.
I hope, old bean, that you and your family are well?
Anonymous said...Presumably the silly rizzla person is linguistically challenged overall, not just in English. His absence of logic reaches beyond the mechanical - as when he pontifies:
"It is better to focus on your own religion and culture than trying to defile others. You may not like the end result."
These sentences are functional if unconnected, and presumably he echoes them without further reflection. Willy nilly is, indeed, his method for assembling the decoupage that he fondly credits as research.
The smoke from his sizzling cigarette paper may blind this non-communicant, and so he ignores the body of His Grace's present post. On the other hand, perhaps there's less behind the cobbler's mask than even I suppose, for he betrays no understanding of either what he reads, or what he writes.
If he's located where he claims to be, one likes to imagine that he will not receive a Census form --
Nevertheless, my message to this Other is: "Mind Your Own."
"It is better to focus on your own religion and culture than trying to defile others. You may not like the end result."
These sentences are functional if unconnected, and presumably he echoes them without further reflection. Willy nilly is, indeed, his method for assembling the decoupage that he fondly credits as research.
The smoke from his sizzling cigarette paper may blind this non-communicant, and so he ignores the body of His Grace's present post. On the other hand, perhaps there's less behind the cobbler's mask than even I suppose, for he betrays no understanding of either what he reads, or what he writes.
If he's located where he claims to be, one likes to imagine that he will not receive a Census form --
Nevertheless, my message to this Other is: "Mind Your Own."
DanJ0 said...The pagans are even out campaigning now:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12589641
"Wiccans, druids, shamans, sacred ecologists, odinists and heathens all make up parts of the Pagan community."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12589641
"Wiccans, druids, shamans, sacred ecologists, odinists and heathens all make up parts of the Pagan community."
srizals said...Oswin, those are allegations, not proof. The family's fine. Thank you for asking. How's yours?
Oswin, A man that reacts to situations at hand must be judged by the situations that exist around him at that time. For example, you're not going to kill anyone around you in where you live since you're not at war. No one is trying to kill you and your loved ones, confiscated your belongings, driving you out from your home, stripping you to the bone, literally. You are not in a state of war nor being threaten constantly to annihilation by greater, cruel foes that find torturing and killing as amusing. So you don’t have to confiscate the belongings of your enemy to stop their ability to destroy you while financing your own defence effort after exhaustive oral defence. The West took it further by introducing the concept of total war, which literally means, everyone and everything has to perish in order to destroy the enemy’s capabilities to make war. They don’t like it when the terrorists copied their total war concept though. The West had adopted the same oral defence by reminding the Germans that the Nazi had been lying to them that they cannot win the war and foremost they would not relent. And millions of Germans perished after the war was over, everyone, even those who do not agree with Hitler. Only the smart Nazis would live on lavishly in the US to err, help with NASA and all.
Anon at 15:12,
You don't even know your own church history. Read first and maybe we'll talk later. Give yourself an identity. Stop being a brave anonymous commenter. I don’t think you know the characteristics of a paedophile. A paedophile exploits, dehumanises and tends to kill his victims to satisfy his sick needs! A husband does not. A victim suffers in humiliation and resents his/her torturer. A wife is respected, honoured and treated with dignity in what is resented by most nowadays, by most Westerners, a decent legal family unit. A wife does not suffer anything as a victim has suffered.
The Christian Byzantium royals practised young marriages, and even your past Christian king! I'll be careful if I were you. You might end up saying bad things about your own royalty and decent Christian’s history. However, these are the only documented events in history we know of. Most will never be known. Interestingly, the likely ages for a young woman to marry in the West then were not like today. Most importantly, a girl is not a girl when she is a woman. If you don't understand this, ask any scientist, better, a biologist. The late age of marriage nowadays are the result of none other but the availability of contraceptive pills and modernity requirements. Everything is too expensive and overly priced since most can only eat millions and billions of money. We need to have lots of papers and plastics to live nowadays to feed their greed. A thousand years ago, we would have been stoned to death for not paying our bills with gold and silver.
Oswin, A man that reacts to situations at hand must be judged by the situations that exist around him at that time. For example, you're not going to kill anyone around you in where you live since you're not at war. No one is trying to kill you and your loved ones, confiscated your belongings, driving you out from your home, stripping you to the bone, literally. You are not in a state of war nor being threaten constantly to annihilation by greater, cruel foes that find torturing and killing as amusing. So you don’t have to confiscate the belongings of your enemy to stop their ability to destroy you while financing your own defence effort after exhaustive oral defence. The West took it further by introducing the concept of total war, which literally means, everyone and everything has to perish in order to destroy the enemy’s capabilities to make war. They don’t like it when the terrorists copied their total war concept though. The West had adopted the same oral defence by reminding the Germans that the Nazi had been lying to them that they cannot win the war and foremost they would not relent. And millions of Germans perished after the war was over, everyone, even those who do not agree with Hitler. Only the smart Nazis would live on lavishly in the US to err, help with NASA and all.
Anon at 15:12,
You don't even know your own church history. Read first and maybe we'll talk later. Give yourself an identity. Stop being a brave anonymous commenter. I don’t think you know the characteristics of a paedophile. A paedophile exploits, dehumanises and tends to kill his victims to satisfy his sick needs! A husband does not. A victim suffers in humiliation and resents his/her torturer. A wife is respected, honoured and treated with dignity in what is resented by most nowadays, by most Westerners, a decent legal family unit. A wife does not suffer anything as a victim has suffered.
The Christian Byzantium royals practised young marriages, and even your past Christian king! I'll be careful if I were you. You might end up saying bad things about your own royalty and decent Christian’s history. However, these are the only documented events in history we know of. Most will never be known. Interestingly, the likely ages for a young woman to marry in the West then were not like today. Most importantly, a girl is not a girl when she is a woman. If you don't understand this, ask any scientist, better, a biologist. The late age of marriage nowadays are the result of none other but the availability of contraceptive pills and modernity requirements. Everything is too expensive and overly priced since most can only eat millions and billions of money. We need to have lots of papers and plastics to live nowadays to feed their greed. A thousand years ago, we would have been stoned to death for not paying our bills with gold and silver.
srizals said...Oswin, those are allegations, not proof. The family's fine. Thank you for asking. How's yours?
Oswin, A man that reacts to situations at hand must be judged by the situations that exist around him at that time. For example, you're not going to kill anyone around you in where you live since you're not at war. No one is trying to kill you and your loved ones, confiscated your belongings, driving you out from your home, stripping you to the bone, literally. You are not in a state of war nor being threaten constantly to annihilation by greater, cruel foes that find torturing and killing as amusing. So you don’t have to confiscate the belongings of your enemy to stop their ability to destroy you while financing your own defence effort after exhaustive oral defence. The West took it further by introducing the concept of total war, which literally means, everyone and everything has to perish in order to destroy the enemy’s capabilities to make war. They don’t like it when the terrorists copied their total war concept though. The West had adopted the same oral defence by reminding the Germans that the Nazi had been lying to them that they cannot win the war and foremost they would not relent. And millions of Germans perished after the war was over, everyone, even those who do not agree with Hitler.
Anon at 15:12,
You don't even know your own church history. Read first and maybe we'll talk later. Give yourself an identity. Stop being a brave anonymous commentor. I don’t think you know the characteristics of a paedophile. A paedophile exploits, dehumanises and tends to kill his victims to satisfy his sick needs! A husband does not. A victim suffers in humiliation and resents his/her torturer. A wife is respected, honoured and treated with dignity in what is resented by most nowadays, by most Westerners, a decent legal family unit. A wife does not suffer anything as a victim has suffered.
The Christian Byzantium royals practised young marriages, and even your past Christian king! I'll be careful if I were you. You might end up saying bad things about your own royalty and decent Christian’s history. However, these are the only documented events in history we know of.
Oswin, A man that reacts to situations at hand must be judged by the situations that exist around him at that time. For example, you're not going to kill anyone around you in where you live since you're not at war. No one is trying to kill you and your loved ones, confiscated your belongings, driving you out from your home, stripping you to the bone, literally. You are not in a state of war nor being threaten constantly to annihilation by greater, cruel foes that find torturing and killing as amusing. So you don’t have to confiscate the belongings of your enemy to stop their ability to destroy you while financing your own defence effort after exhaustive oral defence. The West took it further by introducing the concept of total war, which literally means, everyone and everything has to perish in order to destroy the enemy’s capabilities to make war. They don’t like it when the terrorists copied their total war concept though. The West had adopted the same oral defence by reminding the Germans that the Nazi had been lying to them that they cannot win the war and foremost they would not relent. And millions of Germans perished after the war was over, everyone, even those who do not agree with Hitler.
Anon at 15:12,
You don't even know your own church history. Read first and maybe we'll talk later. Give yourself an identity. Stop being a brave anonymous commentor. I don’t think you know the characteristics of a paedophile. A paedophile exploits, dehumanises and tends to kill his victims to satisfy his sick needs! A husband does not. A victim suffers in humiliation and resents his/her torturer. A wife is respected, honoured and treated with dignity in what is resented by most nowadays, by most Westerners, a decent legal family unit. A wife does not suffer anything as a victim has suffered.
The Christian Byzantium royals practised young marriages, and even your past Christian king! I'll be careful if I were you. You might end up saying bad things about your own royalty and decent Christian’s history. However, these are the only documented events in history we know of.
srizals said...Most will never be known. Interestingly, the likely ages for a young woman to marry in the West then were not like today. Most importantly, a girl is not a girl when she is a woman. If you don't understand this, ask any scientist, better, a biologist. The late age of marriage nowadays is the result of none other but the availability of contraceptive pills and modernity requirements. Everything is too expensive and overly priced since most can only eat millions and billions of money. We need to have lots of papers and plastics to live nowadays to feed their greed. A thousand years ago, we would have been stoned to death for not paying our bills with gold and silver.
The tendency of not marrying at all while living like a husband and wife is a widespread norm in most Christian based countries. It is never a norm in any Muslim based countries.
You said the prophet was a paedophile, so he’s a sadistic criminal. There must be victims (since a paedophile can’t stop at only a victim) that despised him, hated him so much that they would do anything to have justice and exposed his evil to the society, remember, a paedophile preys on little girls and boys and never marries them. (It was never a paedophile’s intention to be a good husband and older victims with proper bodily function cannot satisfy his manipulative and sadistic lust). Name me one victim if you can. If there is no victim, could there be a crime? Interestingly, do you know since when was this allegation started? Right after his marriage or a thousand years after? And we all age with time, so did Aisyah r.a. She grew wiser and older with her husband and continued his mission long after he’s return to the Lord’s mercy. No one dared to refute her since only a wife knew her husband better than anyone. Islam was preserved in this way despite conflicts that follow shortly after the prophet’s return to God’s mercy, as we all will, I pray.
Anon at 19:45,
Isn’t that what you're likely doing? Instead of addressing what I've raised, you just talk elegantly without any facts as comparison to refute me. A linguist I presume? Sorry for my mistake.
"It is better for us to focus on our own religion and culture than trying to defile others. We may not like the end result." There, I have amended the sentences. Thank you for reminding me.
The tendency of not marrying at all while living like a husband and wife is a widespread norm in most Christian based countries. It is never a norm in any Muslim based countries.
You said the prophet was a paedophile, so he’s a sadistic criminal. There must be victims (since a paedophile can’t stop at only a victim) that despised him, hated him so much that they would do anything to have justice and exposed his evil to the society, remember, a paedophile preys on little girls and boys and never marries them. (It was never a paedophile’s intention to be a good husband and older victims with proper bodily function cannot satisfy his manipulative and sadistic lust). Name me one victim if you can. If there is no victim, could there be a crime? Interestingly, do you know since when was this allegation started? Right after his marriage or a thousand years after? And we all age with time, so did Aisyah r.a. She grew wiser and older with her husband and continued his mission long after he’s return to the Lord’s mercy. No one dared to refute her since only a wife knew her husband better than anyone. Islam was preserved in this way despite conflicts that follow shortly after the prophet’s return to God’s mercy, as we all will, I pray.
Anon at 19:45,
Isn’t that what you're likely doing? Instead of addressing what I've raised, you just talk elegantly without any facts as comparison to refute me. A linguist I presume? Sorry for my mistake.
"It is better for us to focus on our own religion and culture than trying to defile others. We may not like the end result." There, I have amended the sentences. Thank you for reminding me.
Anonymous said...srizals:You are absolutely laughable. I know the history of the English church very well - you don't so don't "pontificate." You don't even seem to have read the Koran.
Contraception has little to do with the age of marriage. The minimum age of marriage is set by law and is well above what Mohammed considered acceptable when searching out young girls.
There are a lot of victims of Muslim paedophiles in this country. See recent cases of Muslim Pakistanis. As you are on the internet look up the meaning of paedophile as you obviously don't know it. For girls it seems to be accepted that the minimum definition is sex with pre-pubescent females. Obviously many Muslims commit much worse offences than this.
I used anonymous as I don't have a google account. Others use made up names. My real name, if it matters, is Hannam.
You claim a paedophile can't stop at one victim and never marries them. You seem very familiar with this! It is, however total nonsense. Are you really saying that if a Muslim rapes a 6 year old girl and then marries her 10 years later it wasn't a paedophile act? Complete nutter.
On victims: A young child may not know it is a victim so does that mean that Mohammed going with very young girls is not a paedophile act?
As I said before, delusional to which I add despicable and completely illogical.
Contraception has little to do with the age of marriage. The minimum age of marriage is set by law and is well above what Mohammed considered acceptable when searching out young girls.
There are a lot of victims of Muslim paedophiles in this country. See recent cases of Muslim Pakistanis. As you are on the internet look up the meaning of paedophile as you obviously don't know it. For girls it seems to be accepted that the minimum definition is sex with pre-pubescent females. Obviously many Muslims commit much worse offences than this.
I used anonymous as I don't have a google account. Others use made up names. My real name, if it matters, is Hannam.
You claim a paedophile can't stop at one victim and never marries them. You seem very familiar with this! It is, however total nonsense. Are you really saying that if a Muslim rapes a 6 year old girl and then marries her 10 years later it wasn't a paedophile act? Complete nutter.
On victims: A young child may not know it is a victim so does that mean that Mohammed going with very young girls is not a paedophile act?
As I said before, delusional to which I add despicable and completely illogical.
srizals said...Hannam,
Allow me to refer to the basis of a dominant religion familiar to you, since many Christians nowadays think that they have this Judea-Christian heritage,
1. “Child marriage was possible in Judaism, due to the very low marriageable age for females. A ketannah (literally meaning little [one]) was any girl between the age of 3 years and that of 12 years plus one day”
This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia article"Majority"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage
2. Baptism, usually at birth, was the fundamental rite of incorporation into the body of Christ and the Church…Betrothal, sometimes as early as the age of five, marked another stage in the child’s social incorporation.
(Byzantine Studies: 2006 Spring Symposium, http://www.doaks.org/byz_2006_symposium_abstracts.html)
3. “It is not uncommon case, especially in France, for a girl of scarce ten years to be married and a mother next year. . . . It seems portentous, and yet we sometimes see it, especially in Britain and Italy, that a tender child is married to a septuagenarian [i.e. a man in his seventies]. . . . Yet Church laws do not rescind such nuptials”
Quoted in G.G. Coulton, Medieval Panorama (New York: MacMillan, 1944), 639
4. In the twelfth century, Pope Alexander III ruled:
If a girl of tender age is betrothed and delivered to her husband, and afterwards desires to marry a different man, her petition is not to be granted if her husband swears that he has had carnal knowledge of her even at the early age of eleven or twelve.
Quoted in John Fulton, The Laws of Marriage (New York: E. and J.B. Young, 1883), 112.
5. Roman law gave the minimum age for marriage as that of puberty which was 14 for boys and 12 for girls; these remained the legal age for marriage until the late 19th Century in Britain…There is however evidence that child marriages were reasonably common in North West England in the 16th century
(Marriage: Laws and Customs, http://www.isle-of- man.com/manxnotebook/famhist/genealgy/marr.htm)
6. Further arguments that I don't wish to repeat here,
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2010/12/mohammed-was-liberal-democrat.html
7. The origin of the word in dispute was coined in the 1950 -1955. It was not a problem before that I guess. The paedophiles had appeared and gave birth to the term we know of today.
1950–55; pedo-1 + -phile, or directly < Greek paidóphilos loving children
Dictionary.com Unabridged
8. In Britain, for example, among the most notorious of criminals are Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, who in the two years ending in 1965 murdered a number of children, whom they buried on Saddleworth Moor. The children were sexually assaulted and tortured before being killed. The prospect of their release produces considerable public outcry whenever it is mooted.
http://www.human-being.nl/Library/demonology.htm
Allow me to refer to the basis of a dominant religion familiar to you, since many Christians nowadays think that they have this Judea-Christian heritage,
1. “Child marriage was possible in Judaism, due to the very low marriageable age for females. A ketannah (literally meaning little [one]) was any girl between the age of 3 years and that of 12 years plus one day”
This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia article"Majority"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage
2. Baptism, usually at birth, was the fundamental rite of incorporation into the body of Christ and the Church…Betrothal, sometimes as early as the age of five, marked another stage in the child’s social incorporation.
(Byzantine Studies: 2006 Spring Symposium, http://www.doaks.org/byz_2006_symposium_abstracts.html)
3. “It is not uncommon case, especially in France, for a girl of scarce ten years to be married and a mother next year. . . . It seems portentous, and yet we sometimes see it, especially in Britain and Italy, that a tender child is married to a septuagenarian [i.e. a man in his seventies]. . . . Yet Church laws do not rescind such nuptials”
Quoted in G.G. Coulton, Medieval Panorama (New York: MacMillan, 1944), 639
4. In the twelfth century, Pope Alexander III ruled:
If a girl of tender age is betrothed and delivered to her husband, and afterwards desires to marry a different man, her petition is not to be granted if her husband swears that he has had carnal knowledge of her even at the early age of eleven or twelve.
Quoted in John Fulton, The Laws of Marriage (New York: E. and J.B. Young, 1883), 112.
5. Roman law gave the minimum age for marriage as that of puberty which was 14 for boys and 12 for girls; these remained the legal age for marriage until the late 19th Century in Britain…There is however evidence that child marriages were reasonably common in North West England in the 16th century
(Marriage: Laws and Customs, http://www.isle-of- man.com/manxnotebook/famhist/genealgy/marr.htm)
6. Further arguments that I don't wish to repeat here,
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2010/12/mohammed-was-liberal-democrat.html
7. The origin of the word in dispute was coined in the 1950 -1955. It was not a problem before that I guess. The paedophiles had appeared and gave birth to the term we know of today.
1950–55; pedo-1 + -phile, or directly < Greek paidóphilos loving children
Dictionary.com Unabridged
8. In Britain, for example, among the most notorious of criminals are Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, who in the two years ending in 1965 murdered a number of children, whom they buried on Saddleworth Moor. The children were sexually assaulted and tortured before being killed. The prospect of their release produces considerable public outcry whenever it is mooted.
http://www.human-being.nl/Library/demonology.htm
srizals said...9. "For example, in the 1980s, one British Member of Parliament, Geoffrey Dickens, exposed a knighted ex-diplomat as a paedophile activist, alleged that such people were working at Buckingham Palace, accused a doctor and a vicar under parliamentary protection from slander and contended that there were child brothels in London. So ingrained was the notion of paedophilia in high places that a damaging smear campaign against a British government minister was effectively perpetrated by intelligence services (Jenkins, 1992)."
Ibid.
10. “So what is happening in our schools? Why are young kids being sexulized at an early age? why is it that reports involving the high society of our world are involved in under age sex activities, and are you aware that in other EU countries the age of consent is from 9, why?”
http://www.christianconspiracy.org/Articles/paedophile-paradise.html
11. 50k sex offenders in Britain can remove their names from police registers.
http://www.news-reader.info/82903/paedophiles/#1352512
12. MORE than 25,000 paedophiles are living in Scotland, according to a shocking new report.
Bob McLachlan, who ran the Metropolitan Police Paedophile Unit, studied convicted and suspected child- abusers and identified 250,000 throughout Britain.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-93904090.html
I honestly do not know the race and religion distribution of the paedophiles in your country Hannam. Maybe you could enlighten me on the percentages regarding race and religion of the offenders.
13. "The man, who himself had a long history of sexually abusing boys, told them that the paedophiles they were investigating had been spending a lot of time in Amsterdam, where they had become involved with a group of exiled British child abusers who had succeeded in commercialising their sexual obsession. They were trafficking boys from other countries; running legitimate gay brothels and selling the under-aged boys ‘under the counter’ and through escort agencies; they had branched out into the production of hard-core child pornography. And they had killed some of them."
http://www.nickdavies.net/2000/10/01/paedophilia-is-easy-2-how-a-paedophile-murder-inquiry-fell-apart/
Err, our hero, Mr. Geert is busy scaring himself and other Hollanders on something else to distract them from reality.
14. I can go on if you insist, Hannam. Hope you can stop laughing and start thinking for a while.
Ibid.
10. “So what is happening in our schools? Why are young kids being sexulized at an early age? why is it that reports involving the high society of our world are involved in under age sex activities, and are you aware that in other EU countries the age of consent is from 9, why?”
http://www.christianconspiracy.org/Articles/paedophile-paradise.html
11. 50k sex offenders in Britain can remove their names from police registers.
http://www.news-reader.info/82903/paedophiles/#1352512
12. MORE than 25,000 paedophiles are living in Scotland, according to a shocking new report.
Bob McLachlan, who ran the Metropolitan Police Paedophile Unit, studied convicted and suspected child- abusers and identified 250,000 throughout Britain.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-93904090.html
I honestly do not know the race and religion distribution of the paedophiles in your country Hannam. Maybe you could enlighten me on the percentages regarding race and religion of the offenders.
13. "The man, who himself had a long history of sexually abusing boys, told them that the paedophiles they were investigating had been spending a lot of time in Amsterdam, where they had become involved with a group of exiled British child abusers who had succeeded in commercialising their sexual obsession. They were trafficking boys from other countries; running legitimate gay brothels and selling the under-aged boys ‘under the counter’ and through escort agencies; they had branched out into the production of hard-core child pornography. And they had killed some of them."
http://www.nickdavies.net/2000/10/01/paedophilia-is-easy-2-how-a-paedophile-murder-inquiry-fell-apart/
Err, our hero, Mr. Geert is busy scaring himself and other Hollanders on something else to distract them from reality.
14. I can go on if you insist, Hannam. Hope you can stop laughing and start thinking for a while.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)