Monday, November 30, 2009

Immigration and Colonalisation: A Simple Comparison

srizals@gmail.com

Nowadays, everyone is anxious about the survival of their culture and their association with their homeland. Malays too. I read somewhere that I failed to save, that mass immigration to a point that a local inhabitants become the minority is considered as a threat to the solid foundation of a nation.

Look what it did to Singapore. Well, Singapore wasn't Singapore back then. It was Temasik, and then became Singapura under a Sultan which is a continuity of the great Johore Riau Empire. Same people governing them of course. The policy of the Great Britain back then, made the Sultan and the Malays as mere insignificant minority and all Malay heritage was engulfed by inhumane law which saw their residents became like the Forbidden City. I don't know what is with the Chinese. They can't stand royalty I guess. But I understand their former experience of worshipping their emperors.

Back then, the worlds are on their knees. They were colonalised by the great imperial powers that seek to spread Christianity and in the same time looted as much as they can to prosper themselves. For instance, iron and tin from the Malaya. The locals were mere slaves actually. Their lives are expendable. Any resistance would mean death, imprisonment or banishment. The locals or original inhabitants suffered and humiliated. They were oppressed to a point lower than animals.

The Portuguese, Russians, Dutch, French, British, Spanish, Italians and even the Americans to name a few, were coloniser. They were the masters n most Muslims and other races were the slaves and the oppressed. They prosper themselves by the death and the miseries of their captives.

The Malays had to accept more than a million Non Malays as one of the condition of freedom from our former master. No, we didn't bring them in like what the US did with its African American community. The British did. They had to, since the Malays were too lazy to help them looting their own country! We were only about 5 to 6 millions I think after hundred of years fighting for our lives against the Buddhist Siamese, Christian Portuguese, the Dutch and the English.

Scary eh? I mean having to accept a bulk of foreigners all at once and some were loyal slaves of the British Empire by being their slave soldiers and spies, fighting the Malays. But Malays being Malays, we chose a peaceful settlement and compromise. It worked well except with some glitches now and then. What do U expect? Perfection like the French Revolution? Everyone has flaws ok. That is what being human all about.

The Red Indians were not that lucky. They lost the Great Plains. They lost their mighty buffaloes. The White American Settlers were happy. The British were not that happy. So did the natives of Australia. But time is a phenomenon that can't rewind itself. That is what the Zionist are trying to do then and especially now. They are fully aware of this. They are trying to use time against the right of the Palestinians.

Eventually everyone would lose interest. Hopefully. U see, the Westerners would never see things like the Easterners, as the Oppressors or former Oppressors would never have judgments or basis of comparison like those who were oppressed. They couldn't, if they do, they had to lower their proud nose and bow in humiliation and constantly asking for forgiveness for what they had done. They couldn't return all the loots. Come on, it would deprived their economy. Would U return things U had stolen from your victims? I think not. Would U share the wealth with their offspring? Now, that is the question.

I don't see any similarities with nowadays controlled immigration of different races to your country with our near death experience, do you?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Do comment with your open heart n mind.