KINGOFHIGHCS said...- Dear Srizals. Answers Prt 2 comment continued ' had no option to fight since there were only 12 of them against so many'. Matthew 51 And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear. Matthew 52 Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? Matthew 54 But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? Luke 22:49 When they which were about him saw what would follow, they said unto him, Lord, shall we smite with the sword? Luke 22:50 And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. Luke 22:51 And Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. And he touched his ear, and healed him. Do you not understand anything about Christ and what he said?. His Followers WRONGLY thought they should fight. You see, Christ corrected his disciples to NOT think like men but as He commanded them to be! This is SO typical of Moslems (especially Mohammed, as you give by your statement's a vivid depiction of how the contradictions in your Qu'ran came about through Mohammed listening to stories as told by monks?. Hear a few stories from the Bible, (as you are not really paying attention to the events, people involved or what was said by the characters involved, etc). Then. hey presto, a new narrative is given, perverted from the original event written down on paper which can be verified as true and show the new narrative as false, put together by the vivid imagination and interpretation of the listener . I disagree with Islam and for me it is no different from Mormonism, that preach another prophet ( Joseph Smith or Muhammed) and another Book (Book Of Mormon or Quaran). The least of the Prophets in the Bible is greater than any of the above mentioned. Where is their authentication of/by prophecy or miracles?? None!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If Joseph Smith did exactly the same thing..Again the poor Angels are blamed for spreading another GOSPEL? Why should Mohammed be let off from the same accusation of making up his own religion for personal gain and to be worshipped as a Prophet of God, like Joseph Smith wanted to be and is by Mormons?.. So Says KINGOFHIGHCS
- KINGOFHIGHCS said...
- Lets try again as my comments keep disappearing YG Dear Srizals. Answers Prt 1 (a) After looking at your blog http://answering-questioning.blogspot.com/ I have now a greater insight into the working of your thinking, which I find quite scary. Your site is full of rants against the Jewish people, a book review accusing Jews of debasing America and the introduction of Pornography?? as it's on your blog you must agree with it's statements and conclusions? Who can truly know and understand the Moslem hatred for the Jew???. It can only be SATANIC! Your Blog should instead say 'Introducing Lies n Hate! On a previous comment on Cranmer 3 October 2010 20:44 you said 'The early followers of Christ, and I don't think they are even Christians, Acts 11:26, "and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. And it came about that for an entire year they met with the church, and taught considerable numbers; and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch." They were called CHRISTIANS by the Greeks in Antioch, the Greek word Χριστιανός (christianos)—meaning "follower of Christ"—comes from Χριστός (christos)—meaning "anointed one" In the Greek Septuagint (written between 280-270 BC), christos was used to translate the Hebrew מָשִׁיחַ (Mašíaḥ, messiah), meaning "[one who is] anointed." since Paul was not even born yet at that time, Despite the agreement achieved at the Council of Jerusalem as understood by Paul, Paul recounts how he later publicly confronted Peter, also called the "Incident at Antioch" over Peter's reluctance to share a meal with Gentile Christians in Antioch. YES, THE SAME PETER WHO WAS CHRIST' S DISCIPLE, SO HOW COULD PAUL HAVE NOT BEEN BORN YET!
- KINGOFHIGHCS said...
- Dear Srizals Answers Prt 1 (b) Writing later of the incident, Paul recounts: "I opposed [Peter] to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong". Paul reports that he told Peter: "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?"[Gal. 2:11–14] Paul also mentions that even Barnabas (his traveling companion and fellow apostle until that time) sided with Peter. Around 50-52AD Paul spent 18 months in Corinth. The reference in The Book of Acts to proconsul Gallio helps ascertain this date Paul arrived in Jerusalem in 57 AD with a collection of money for the congregation there. The Book of Acts reports that the church welcomed Paul gladly, but it was apparently a proposal of James that led to his arrest.Paul caused a stir when he appeared at the Temple, and he escaped being killed by the crowd by being taken into custody.He was held as a prisoner for two years in Caesarea until a new governor reopened his case in 59 AD. When accused of treason, he appealed to Caesar, claiming his right as a citizen of Rome to appear there before a proper court and to defend himself of the charges. So Says KINGOFHIGHCS
- KINGOFHIGHCS said...
- Dear Srizals You keep saying Prophet Abraham yet you are not descended from him, WHY DO YOU DO THIS. You (Moslems) are not descendent from Ishmael(show me the geneologies that proof this)as were called Ishmaelites who intermarried with other tribes! Midianites (He was an illegitimate child through HAGAR The handmaiden of Sarah..Isaac is the true Legitimate Son and Heir)! I have asked you previously You are not of the Abrahamic Covenant (through Ishmael) and neither are Christians as we are not of Racial descent of the promise of the Land nor of King David but our Faith and righteous is accorded to us through the same belief as Abraham revealed by YHWH in The Redeemer Jesus Christ (the one true sacrifice for sin). As Moslems believe they are racially descendent from Ishmael yet No scripture in the Old or New Testament states this to be the case what is your assumption made on? Were not Moses 'people' The Children of Israel not Children of Ishmael? Were there not Egyptians,Persians Akkadians,Babylonians, Assyrians, Hittites,Sumerians etc who lived before, during and after Abraham? What tragedy happened to them , these millions of people who were not descendent of Abraham. Where are they or where did they go? It appears that every Arab in the world is descendent from Ishmael.. Yet again I ask you how can this be so that all Arabs in the world are descendedt from Ishmael, What happened to all the other tribes in the region before during and after Abraham? What happened to them????? So Says KINGOFHIGHCS
- KINGOFHIGHCS said...
- Dear Srizals PS..Copy and pasting a large section from the Qu'ran may look impressive but it is an empty gesture on a blog as you have done above in response to my taking sections from the Qu'ran that agree with the Bible in one part then disagree by contradicting itself a later. This this only proves your lack of understanding at what I have placed beside my argument, to show you were wrong in the first place! You ask foolish questions; 'Is this the proof of a Judaeo-Christian heritage Mr. KINGOFHIGHCS? John 10:30-33 I and My Father are one.” Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?” The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.” 8 December 2010 04:48 ' 'Jesus said these things, and lifting up his eyes to heaven, he said, “Father, the time has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may also glorify you…. This is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and him whom you sent, Jesus Christ.” — John 17:1,3 Was Jesus praying to himself or a part of separate entity of himself? Or should we say something has been tampered with? The definition of son and father in the bible is also controversial as it is translated from different languages.' Purely as if to show you do not understand how to make an argument and it falls into complete idiocy Sorry, You are not impressing me! So Says KINGOFHIGHCS
- KINGOFHIGHCS said...
- Dear Srizals You and other Moslems appear to have a problem dealing with the concept of Triune Godhead, so let me pose a question for you? I place a cube of Iced Water into a kettle. As it boils, the ice melts to liquid and as it reaches boiling point, it lets off steam. In which part of the process did the 3 forms stop being water (H2O)? Do you understand the analogy (inference)? So Says KINGOFHIGHCS
- srizals said...
- Trying, can you give another? Thanks.
Thursday, December 9, 2010
The Progeny of Abraham vs. The Progeny of Adam. The Progeny of The Apes. (Not Included)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)